Globalization & Technology essays

Globalization & Technology essays The world must run in an orderly fashion. Without order and peace, the world would be in crumbles. Every country has its own government, whether it is ruled by the people or by a tyrant and every country has its own set of laws in which they must abide by. The government establishes the laws to keep the peace. The establishing of the law could be endangered if it only benefits one particular group and not the other. The relationship between the government and the big business is that these big businesses are persuading the government to establish laws that will only benefit themselves. These corporations give these electives money to support their campaigns, only to have them side on certain topics of interest to their corporation. Their biggest concerns may be opposition to unions, high taxes, and government regulations ( Finsterbusch 193). Those large corporations are trying to find the best solution of raising profits and keeping the cost of productivity down. McDonaldized corporations are building a company with efficiency, calculability, predictability, and control (Ritzer 12). People today are in such a hurry that they want something fast and efficient; these corporations are offering these kinds of services, which make them popular. The restaurants known as McDonalds was constructed to have people come in and out without lingering too long. With their profit ability, they are able to cancel out human error by replacing in soda machines that automatically stops themselves from overflowing and a basket that holds the fries that times itself to keep it from burning. Along with these technologies and minimum wage workers, McDonalds is able to cut the cost of productivity for a more profitable return of income. For all these corporations to become more profitable, they must use more resources. With the using of resources comes the responsibility of taking better care of the environment. Accor...

ESL and an Introduction to Suggestopedia

ESL and an Introduction to Suggestopedia This method was developed by Dr. Georgi Lazanov and is basically (very basically, this is all pretty new for me) on a teaching approach that seems to throw the traditional, grammar based - left brain approach out the window, and advocates a holistic, right brain approach. I wont try to describe the method in this feature. This approach is new for me (although I did write a short feature a while back based on some of its principles). I would prefer to lead you to some introductory articles on the Net discussing this technique as it is quite novel (at least for me) and, I think, has quite a lot of potential.To start off lets take a look at this introduction to using this technique in second language acquisition.Libyan Labiosa Cassone is President of the Society for Accelerative Learning and Teaching, and in this interview gives quite a detailed overview of how the teaching method works. This method can be employed for any type of learning. For more information regarding the various app lications of this technique take a look at the followingFinally, here is an article that discusses the use of suggestopedia in a classroom environment and more specifically in a language teaching environment: SummaryI find myself quite attracted to this method as it seems to reflect my own experiences with language learning. While learning German and Italian my best learning always seemed to take place while immersing myself in tasks that were less analytical and caused my brain to work on the language as an entire unit rather than in bits and pieces. Of course, Im speaking about the experience of living in the country where one doesnt have the time to analyze everything and therefore, begins to absorb and learn on a completely different level.The only reservation that I have about this technique is that the people I have come in contact with who use this approach tend to be rather fanatic about its being the only way. While conviction can be quite persuading, I find it difficult to throw everything overboard.

How to Be a Better Learner Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

How to Be a Better Learner - Essay Example The researcher states that every one of us has his own unique good or bad style of learning new things. Learning preferences change depending upon past experience more than the cognitive differences. â€Å"Style changes over time†, says Dr. Sarah Church. While it is possible to recognize different essential features of a learning style, it must be known that the learning process modifies with the passage of time at the individual level. Robotham also asserts that once students develop a learning style, they tend to refine that style based on three factors: unconscious modifications made by the learner himself, conscious modifications made by the learner, and modifications made by some outside element. The researcher’s past experience tells him that he has adapted quite a few learning styles over time. When the author was a child, he used to enjoy the audio learning style because he enjoyed listening to poems over the cassette player when he had to learn them. But today, the author categorizes himself as a visual independent learner and an assimilator of Kolb’s learning styles. Independent learning is the type of learning in which the learner takes charge of his learning process, according to Holec. This learning style makes the learner responsible as he knows that he is accountable to himself of the consequences. Independent learners are able to make a decision and make informed choices without relying on their teachers and colleagues. Dependent learning style is one in which the learner only does what is required and shows little curiosity in knowing more. Dependent learners are always looking up to their peers, teachers and authority figures for support and guidance.

Behavior problems Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Behavior problems - Essay Example These graduate students were all part of the same master’s degree program and worked with parents of special needs children on a daily basis. The setting of the experiment was in a conference room in the university campus that was ideal for conducting the training workshops. The materials consisted of guide for paper training as well as several examples in form of pictures and videos. These questionnaires were filled by the subjects before as well as after the workshop so that data could be collected for further evaluation. Furthermore the measures for the study comprised of analyzing verbal, non verbal and written verbal behaviors. What were the results of the research? The results of the research indicate that all the participants of the study displayed the use of more support strategies above pre training levels when it came to role playing as well as written assessments. This was a result of mainly a concise3 hour training regarding communication skills.

Moralirtys Fickle Mind :: social issues

Moralirty's Fickle Mind If someone were to ask what morality is, what would one say? Some may think of it as integrity and decency, and others may see it as honesty and candor. However, by contrasting what was moral, and immoral in the past, one can clearly see that people’s concept of morality changes over time. Under what circumstances that this conceptual change takes place, one may never know. What many believe is that morality and immorality together have shaped both thinking and society as a whole, as it continues to be the â€Å"guiding light† under many circumstances. One example of our morality-based society proves itself through history. Slavery lasted for over four hundred years. It is apparent that harsh treatment of this manner lasted for such a long period of time because this type of thinking was accepted during those times. Once it was clear that this type of treatment was wrong, many people’s attitudes (other than blacks) changed toward the treatment of African Americans, so it is clear that morality played a key role in the thinking process and the outcome of how one race dominated another and what the result was. However, one must also take into account the fact that the rich and powerful have major influences over way of life; this is apparent even though a democratic society. The general dominating of one people or race over another still lasts to this day, as it is clear through the Palestinian and Israeli conflict. Another example of how society has been shaped by morality and immorality is the fact that immorality drove pilgrims from an â€Å"immoral† monarchy and led them to create a â€Å"moral† type of government on their own. However, even though morality seems to lead society in a general good direction, such as taking down Hitler’s army, it does not always lead to the best outcome in many circumstances, such as the taking over of smaller countries by the US, or reinstating the death penalty. Even though this government was created from a lesser, worse government, morality still is taking a few turns to make it the best government possible with amendments and laws. A capitalist society may not always benefit us, together as a people, in all the best ways. But as one can see, it is still apparent that morality, even if it is the morality of the rich and powerful, shapes our way of living.

One in a Million Essay

Socrates once said in his Apology that â€Å"The unexamined life is not worth living †(Apology). Stating that a life without knowledge, understanding, or context is one that has no value. This means that everyone who questions their own actions is inputting more value into their own life. Those who think about questions, who question anything are simultaneously applying value into their life. Likewise, when we apply a dollar value to a diseased life, their shouldn’t be someone who is worth $0.00, for that would mean that in their life they were not regarded as a person, but as an object. So the question of assigning value to a life can be essentially answered by the amount of contemplation that person has done in their life, but this answer isn’t practical. As a result, I have divided the value into three aspects, each component will be measured individually and the final â€Å"score† will be an overall report of how much that person’s life is worth . The first category is how much the person valued the life of others, how empathic they were overall. For example the terrorist hijackers of 9/11 have less value than the parents of Audrie Pott’s as the terrorists regarded their ideals to a higher value than the lives of the passengers, and the parents regard the life of their daughter higher than their own reputation (Sulek). The second category is the effect on others that the deceased had while they were alive. To further examine the same comparison, Audrie Pott’s life would be worth less than the terrorists responsible for the September 11th attacks as   the attacks produced a more drastic consequence, increased airport security, occupations in the Middle East, War on Terrorism, etc. than the suicide of Audrie Pott (Sulek). The last category is the potential revenue that the family of the deceased would be deprived from if not for the fiscal compensation they receive from an organization or those held accountable. Allow me to state here that I am not valuing the life of someone on an emotional level, as this is not applicable, nor am I saying that these categories will affect the amount of money that the family receives. This is merely a way to organize the data from somebody’s life to measure the impact they had on the lives of others, in order to have a legible representation of that person’s value. I am also not proposing that this is their exact value, as that would demote the person to descend from the universal god ­like nature that every human has within them down to words on a page against their will. To conclude, I do believe that we must assign value to someone’s life based on the amount of reasons or arguments that can be used to further give value to that person’s life. The amount of money that someone made within their lifetime is used to sustain their lifestyle when they are alive and to fulfill their desires. To further use this logic, the family that is directly affected by the death of the main revenue producer in the household should gain compensation in the event of a sudden cease of income so they may have less worries while they mourn the loved one’s death. This isn’t the value of someone’s life in terms of their personality, but a value of their life’s career, or â€Å"net worth† for lack of a better term. When the September 11th victim’s family were receiving their compensation for the maintenance of their lives they interpreted the government funds as a compensation for the governments mistake. However, this was not the   intention, one of the many reasons was to allow the family’s to not have to adjust to a radical change in a short amount of time adding to the fact that their loved one had just died. To ask if â€Å"†¦it’s degrading to presume that money can make a family whole again?†(Ripley) is a mistaken representation of what the 9/11 victim’s fund was aiming to provide. To think that any material object can make a family whole again is wrong, so to ask that question in itself a vacuous attempt at asking critical questions. Even from the â€Å"cold calculus†(Ripley) that is made to determine how much someone is worth, there is also one formal truth to be concluded from this method of assigning value to someone, no one is worth the nightmarish $0.00, everyone, albeit slowly, will get an amount of money to, hopefully, sustain their lives. Another category is the affect the person’s actions had on others. This includes if there were programs bestowed in their honor, if a great conflict was ended in their honor, etc. Essentially if the celebrity status that the person had was either born or transitioned into their afterlife in the form of celebration. For example, the terrorists of The September 11th attacks are valued more than the average man in that their deaths were the cause for a drastic and radical war against terrorism that affects the world even today. Had Pearl Harbor never had happened, September 11, 2001 would surely have been deemed â€Å"A day that will go down in infamy..† as the consequences of the attacks have caused changes in the economy, national security and even cultural changes as well. This being one way we measure their lives, another is the amount of involvement the person, or group of people had in their community. The people in The World Trade Center weren’t just active within the community of Manhattan, but were essentially a sub ­community, one that was populated with companies, around 430 from 28 countries (List of World Trade   Center Tenants) each providing a different product from Government services, to  personal finances. Consequentially, it would be that the victims who perished in the towers are all valued on par as those who died on Pearl Harbor, or the Germanic ambush in the Teutoburg Forest on Roman legions during the Roman Conquest of Germania. On a further note, the treatment the person bestowed upon people had for others also becomes a factor in deciding how we value that person’s life. Any soldier who ever lived, no matter how noble, or docile will be lower than volunteers who helped villages in Third World Countries. The boys who caused the preparatory environment inviting Audrie Pott to commit suicide (Sulek) are less valuable than Hamlet when he is questioning whether he should act or not according to his knowledge. Last but not least, the final category of valuing someone’s life is the way they themselves value their own lives. Rather, how they are perceived to have valued their life. Robin Williams and Audrie Pott’s for example, will â€Å"score† lower in this category from their suicides (Sulek) than the passengers who died on Flight 93 during the September 11th attacks. This is a factor since it demonstrates another reason for us to use, a sort of self ­advocacy that the person proposes of their life, such as a biography that documents their achievements. This is why iconic social figures such as Martin Luther King Jr. stay rigidly fixed in the cultural atmosphere as if they were timeless. From the simple fact that Dr.King valued his life, and the lives of others more, that he would lay down his own life to fulfill his â€Å"dream†. Another way we could view this is from the amount of value that the person invests into their ideas, and convictions. For example, the fervor The Westboro Baptist Church demonstrates through picketstands and protest   for their beliefs that â€Å"God hates Fags† is why they are in our awareness in the first place. The final example we can use is the amount of questioning the person had done throughout their life, if they were an intellectual or not. Had Audrie Pott given her situation a bit of thought she would’ve come to the conclusion that the very situation she found herself in would, just as everything else, dissipate into her past. Furthermore, those who question life, are building the foundations of Western Civilization as we know it in their minds, for had it not been for the philosopher’s inquiries then the disciplines regarding Mathematics, Science, Psychology would never have been created. Even religions such as Buddhism, with their innate nature of self ­reflectiveness would not have been created had it not been for the reflective nature of humans. In conclusion, all of these aspects I have touched on are all to be combined in one final report to value someone’s life. They are not to be considered individually as that would not only misrepresent the life of the person, but also hinder any true progress in trying to value someone’s life in that this formula would be used incorrectly. Through our legacies from our own actions, determined from our character we create the bits of value that others may pick up on so that they may adequately judge how valuable we were, for a human is not just like a piece of furniture that you value based on it’s utilization or aesthetics, but by their character, and actions.  Through their monetary value to be used to maintain their family’s life and to ensure that they may adjust appropriately to the loss of a loved one. The effect that we have on each other is a vital part in determining how the person is to be valued as we must hold them accountable to their actions, be them beneficial or malicious.  

A Separate Peace Contrasting Gene and Phineas and the...

A Separate Peace: Contrasting Gene and Phineas and the Struggle for Power Julie Gibson John Knowles A Separate Peace depicts many examples of how power is used. In A Separate Peace, two opposing characters struggle for their own separate might. Gene Forrester, the reserved narrator, is weakened by his struggle for power. While, Phineas was inspired by his own power within. The novel conveys how peace can weaken or inspire during a mental war. Phineas, a natural rebel, is known as the best athlete in school. For example, he and three others come to look at a tree, which is considered among the Upper Middler students at Devon an impossibility. Phineas demonstrates his supreme power by stating that the tree is, indeed, a cinch†¦show more content†¦Gene concludes that he killed [his] enemy there, meaning that he killed both Finny and also what was, at the same time, foreign and inadmissable to his way of life (p.196). Gene believes that he is weak. Subconsciencely, he is powerful. If he is not, he could never had the mental strength of pushing Phineas out of the tree. This helpless nudge soon became a random act of violence that ended in death. Did Phineas purposelessly tried to take over Genes life to weaken him and make himself more powerful? Most likely, not. Phineas is the perfectly natural and spontaneous person who is not capable of doing something mean or ugly. He responds to life with natural emotions and all things, except studying, come easily to him. He is not capable of such emotions as jealousy or envy. He lives in a world of happiness and joy and he communicates these qualities to the people whom he meets. Phineas was powerful in many ways: his strength, his spontaneity, and, most of all, hisShow MoreRelatedStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Ju dge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 Pages399 Experiential Exercise What Is a Leader? 399 Ethical Dilemma Undercover Leaders 399 Case Incident 1 Leadership Mettle Forged in Battle 400 Case Incident 2 Leadership Factories 400 13 Power and Politics 411 A Definition of Power 412 Contrasting Leadership and Power 413 Bases of Power 414 Formal Power 414 †¢ Personal Power 415 †¢ Which Bases of Power Are Most Effective? 416 †¢ Power and Perceived Justice 416 Dependence: The Key to Power 416 The General Dependence Postulate 416 †¢ What Creates